[SydPhil] Updated - HPS Research Seminar - Paul Griffiths 4th March 2019

[HPS Admin]

[https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/rZEOCVAGXPtnA1lrtGR7_r?domain=gallery.mailchimp.com]








SCHOOL OF HISTORY

AND PHILOSOPHY

OF SCIENCE
Held in conjunction with the Sydney Centre for the Foundations of Science
SEMESTER ONE 2019
RESEARCH SEMINAR SERIES
MONDAY 4th MARCH 2019










[https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/xZGyCWLJY7iLBvj7TxF-mN?domain=gallery.mailchimp.com]

PROFESSOR PAUL GRIFFITHS
ARC Laureate Fellow, Professor of Philosophy and Domain Leader for Society and Environment, Charles Perkins Centre
Arts and Social Sciences, School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry
THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY







The Normal and the Pathological Revisited.
The dominant view amongst philosophers of medicine is that biological facts are neither necessary nor sufficient to determine whether a phenotype is pathological. Once it has been determined by social facts that a phenotype is a pathological, biomedical science can reveal many facts about that phenotype, but biomedical science cannot reveal that it is a pathology. Given the right social facts, any phenotype could be either pathological or normal. While the internal dialectic in the philosophy of medicine that has led to this position is compelling, from the perspective of the broader biological sciences this is a puzzle. A distinction between the normal and the pathological seems implicit in straightforwardly scientific questions, such as distinguishing parasitic from commensal relationships between species, or regarding pathology as an alternative to the hypothesis that intra-specific variation is maintained by selection.

I argue that discussion of the distinction between the normal and the pathological has been too focused on the human case and the context of clinical medicine. Whilst acknowledging the important insights about the distinction offered by philosophers of medicine, starting with Canguilhem, it is time to acknowledge that the distinction between is part of what Canguilhem’s contemporaries would have called a ‘theory of the organism’ and to integrate the philosophy of medicine with the philosophy of biology.





WHERE: LEVEL 5 FUNCTION ROOM F23
(NEW) ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
AT THE ENTRANCE TO CITY ROAD
CAMPERDOWN CAMPUS
WHEN: MONDAY 4TH MARCH
START: 5.30PM




All Welcome | No Booking Required | Free






Copyright © *2019* *School of HPS,  All rights reserved.


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences<https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/y5a7CXLKZoiPY3nvfDEaEo?domain=sydney.us9.list-manage.com> or unsubscribe from this list<https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/RCjYCYWL1viWxP3RTVu8Xj?domain=sydney.us9.list-manage.com>














This email was sent to debbie.castle at sydney.edu.au<mailto:debbie.castle at sydney.edu.au>
why did I get this?<https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/ieyLCZYM2VFqNyMZIxtUoN?domain=sydney.us9.list-manage.com>    unsubscribe from this list<https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/RCjYCYWL1viWxP3RTVu8Xj?domain=sydney.us9.list-manage.com>    update subscription preferences<https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/y5a7CXLKZoiPY3nvfDEaEo?domain=sydney.us9.list-manage.com>
Unit for History and Philosophy of Science · University of Sydney · Sydney, NSW 2006 · Australia

[Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp]<https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/GDn_C1WZXriAYKpyu1nqHv?domain=mailchimp.com>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.sydney.edu.au/pipermail/sydphil/attachments/20190226/c219a436/attachment-0001.html>