[Usyd_Classics_Events] Reminder: André Laks @ The Critical Antiquities Workshop 11am Today (Fri May 7)

[Ben Brown]

Dear Friends,

Just a reminder that Professor André Laks (Universidad Panamericana, Mexico City) will be presenting his paper, ‘Actualizing Plato’s Laws’ tomorrow at the next Critical Antiquities Workshop.  The meeting will take place on Friday, May 7 11am-12:30pm Sydney time GMT+10 (that’s Thursday, May 6 9-10:30pm in the eastern US). The abstract is posted at the end of this email.

https://uni-sydney.zoom.us/j/82316236134?pwd=ZTkvNCt6Y0RqWXhSVEZQSGU4dWNTZz09

Password: 555185

Best wishes,
Tristan Bradshaw and Ben Brown

Abstract:
Plato’s last and longest dialogue is a fascinating, but little frequented work, even if progress has been made among specialists during the last 30 years or so. This is paradoxical. One cannot conceive of Aristotle Politics, of Polybius’ analysis of the Roman constitution or of Cicero’s pair Republic/Laws – not to speak about the Church Fathers and the Founding Fathers – without referring to Plato’s Laws. For it is there that we find, for the first time, four basic concepts and principles systematically articulated in a cluster that proved to be of lasting political value: that all unaccountable power corrupts; that law should rule; that a ‘mixed’ constitution is the best that human beings can achieve; and that laws require a preamble. On the other hand, actual readers of the Laws, at least in the world most of us still live in, are not likely to feel much affinity with Plato’s ultimate political proposals. There is little doubt that Plato’s “second city” accentuates rather than alleviates the most unpleasant tendencies of the Republic, and that it shows a great number of traits that are, at best, questionable, and at worst – using an anachronistic word that is now at home in the political vocabulary – ‘totalitarian’. The question I want to discuss in my talk is how to think about the relationship between importance, influence and distancing in the case of a work that represents a fundamental benchmark in the history of political thought. But the question is of a more general nature, too.


DR BEN BROWN
Classics and Ancient History
School Undergraduate Curriculum Coordinator (SOPHI)
Research Seminar Coordinator (CAH)
School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry (SOPHI)
THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY NSW 2006
Ph.: 9351 8983; Office: Main Quad J6.07
E benjamin.brown at sydney.edu.au<mailto:benjamin.brown at sydney.edu.au> | W https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/7IpKCxngwOf19GLPQt8aCX2?domain=sydney.edu.au

Recent Book<https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/5bd0CyojxQTr0j7AyHM1Qvr?domain=bmcr.brynmawr.edu>

CRICOS 00026A
This email plus any attachments to it are confidential. Any unauthorised use is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete it and any attachments.

DR BEN BROWN
Classics and Ancient History
School Undergraduate Curriculum Coordinator (SOPHI)
Research Seminar Coordinator (CAH)
School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry (SOPHI)
THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY NSW 2006
Ph.: 9351 8983; Office: Main Quad J6.07
E benjamin.brown at sydney.edu.au<mailto:benjamin.brown at sydney.edu.au> | W https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/7IpKCxngwOf19GLPQt8aCX2?domain=sydney.edu.au

Recent Book<https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/5bd0CyojxQTr0j7AyHM1Qvr?domain=bmcr.brynmawr.edu>

CRICOS 00026A
This email plus any attachments to it are confidential. Any unauthorised use is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete it and any attachments.

Please think of our environment and only print this e-mail if necessary.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.sydney.edu.au/mailman/private/usyd_classics_events/attachments/20210506/a06fd638/attachment-0001.html>