From kathryn.mackay at sydney.edu.au Tue Feb 13 10:42:02 2024 From: kathryn.mackay at sydney.edu.au (Kathryn MacKay) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 23:42:02 +0000 Subject: [SydPhil] SHE Conversation Series| 22nd February 2024| 12.00-1:00 PM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello, Warm invitation to you to the 2024 Semester 1 Sydney Health Ethics Conversation series. Check out the details of our upcoming talk, the first in the series! And, don't forget to lock in that time on your calendar! Speaker Prof. Justin Oakley Deputy Director Monash Bioethics Centre School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies Monash University When 22nd February 2024| 12.00-1:00 PM Where D18.04.411.Susan Wakil Health Building. SWHB Seminar Room 411 This will be a hybrid event. If you are attending online, join through zoom link. Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://uni-sydney.zoom.us/j/86427461396?pwd=cUYyY0o3RC9hWU9QTU94Yk9UajZsdz09 Password: 229913 Title Developing a virtue ethics approach to moral responsibility and blameworthiness in professional role failures Abstract One way of developing a distinctively virtue ethical account of moral responsibility and agent blameworthiness is by analysing the key concepts of avoidability and foreseeability in terms of what a virtuous agent would be able to avoid and foresee, where this can differ from what ?reasonably avoidable? and ?reasonably foreseeable? are usually understood to involve. In the context of medical roles, this account explicates the relevant normative standards for determining moral responsibility and blameworthiness in terms of what a virtuous doctor would have been able to avoid, and what a virtuous doctor would foresee. A key advantage of appealing to the standard of a virtuous doctor here is that this can provide a more enduring normative standard for moral blameworthiness and moral negligence, than does appealing only to what a reasonable doctor would avoid and foresee. In this presentation I argue that explicating the normative standard for blameworthiness and moral negligence in medicine in terms of what a virtuous doctor would avoid and foresee provides a more robust normative standard, which has the resources to help practitioners gain a better understanding of their overarching goal of serving patients? best interests, and of how any given code of medical ethics may need to change so as to better serve that goal. I also bring out how this approach usefully connects moral responsibility, blameworthiness, and negligence to discussions about the attainability of virtues. Seminar will be followed by a "buy your own lunch" at the Grandstand, and we will continue our conversations! Please feel free to contact me if you have questions or require additional information. I look forward to seeing you at the Sydney Health Ethics Conversation! Regards, Supriya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 6512 bytes Desc: not available URL: From anik.waldow at sydney.edu.au Fri Feb 16 12:04:14 2024 From: anik.waldow at sydney.edu.au (Anik Waldow) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 01:04:14 +0000 Subject: [SydPhil] ABC Big Ideas Panel Discussion: Critical Reflections on Science and Religion Message-ID: Where is the Soul in Science? Critical Reflections on Science and Religion Wed, 21 Feb 2024 ? 05:00PM - 07:30PM Nelson Mears Auditorium, Chau Chak Wing Museum Free Registration: https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/rN5_Cp81lrt9rZXwPCPxQvY?domain=eventbrite.com.au Description Science in the West did not emerge fully-formed like Athena from the head of Zeus: theoretical frameworks, methodologies and belief systems have been tested and contested, proven, disproven and abandoned. Yet since the 17th century science has profoundly recast our relationship to the world and ourselves. Science began to provide a logical, systemic framework with which to understand not only the world, but knowledge and values, shifting the axis away from a divinely ordained order bestowed by divine beings and religious authorities to one in which rational scientific thought, agency and objectivity began to hold sway. Science today reminds us of our own agency in the building of new knowledge. But can it provide meaningful orientation in key aspects of human life? Traditionally, religion provided community, connection, certainty, salvation, and a strong cultural and moral framework in the face of chaos. Is science able to address these fundamental human needs? In recent years populism, politics and the pandemic ? together with the rise of disinformation and ?fake news? made possible by unregulated social media ? have decentred the trust in science, with conspiracy theories on the rise in the attempt to find answers and orientation in life What has science failed to deliver? Where is the soul in science? Speakers Anik Waldow (Sydney), Charles Wolfe (Toulouse), Peter Harrison (UQ) Hosted by Natasha Mitchell, ABC Big Ideas ________________________________ Contact The School of Humanities Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, soh.events at sydney.edu.au ANIK WALDOW | Professor of Philosophy | FAHA Department of Philosophy | School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY S404, Quadrangle Building A14 | The University of Sydney | NSW | 2006 | Australia T +61 2 9114 1245 | F +61 2 9351 3918 E anik.waldow at sydney.edu.au Experience Embodied: Early Modern Accounts of the Human Place in Nature, OUP, 2020 https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/2AXzCq71mwf1Avm2GfXJHPZ?domain=global.oup.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From admin at ethicsolympiad.org Sat Feb 17 15:56:59 2024 From: admin at ethicsolympiad.org (Admin) Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 04:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [SydPhil] 2024 AAPAE Ethics Olympiad for Tertiary Students In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <767221337.1987959.1708145820150@mail.yahoo.com> Congratulations to ANU who took out the gold medal at the first AAPAE Ethics Olympiad in October last year. Macquarie University took out the silver medal.? The President of the AAPAE Dr Hugh Breakey recently wrote... "The Ethics Olympiads show that if people are put into structures that reward constructive argument rather than outrage, they can become models of exemplary argument." Dr Breakey also writes:"For those unfamiliar with the event, the Ethics Olympiad brings together teams of three to five ethics athletes (?eth-letes!?) from different universities (with some universities fielding two teams). In each heat, a team is asked to consider an ethical question arising in a case study. The teams are supplied with a document detailing the many case studies beforehand, which they have studied and discussed. In the heat, one of those case studies is used, and the team is presented with a previously undisclosed ethical question about that case. The team-members must develop an answer to the question, and then provide ethical arguments supporting that answer. Then, the other team fashions a reply, and a structured discussion and question-and-answer period ensues. The teams are scored according to set criteria which reward clear, concise, respectful discourse. At the end of the day, scores are collated, and teams are awarded Gold, Silver and Bronze medals based on the scores. All participants receive a certificate with the winning teams getting medals. The Ethics Olympiad aims to provide participants with a unique and rewarding experience as they engage with other tertiary students from throughout Australasia in a format that promotes civil, critical and collaborative discourse. Having watched and judged the last two Tertiary Olympiads, the thing that I love about the Ethics Olympiads is now respectful the deliberation is, and how much this impacts on the discussion?s philosophical quality. When students know that they will be scored on responding thoughtfully and sensitively?rather than aggressively and dismissively?to other students? arguments, they demonstrate impressive capabilities to listen carefully and respond fairly to others? views. From surveying the quality of arguments in social media, political debate, and most opinion writing in major presses, it?s easy to get the impression that arguing well is a lost art. Too often, arguments are riven with straw person fallacies, ad hominem, rampant confirmation bias, and rhetorical point-scoring...."? The 2024 AAPAE Ethics Olympiad will be held on October 10th, 2024 If you would like to pass this invitation on to colleagues, please feel free. Here is a link with more information and a registration point. Please note that there is a maximum of two teams from each university allowed to enter.? 2024 AAPAE Tertiary Ethics Olympiad ? Ethics Olympiad Matthew WillsEthics Olympiad Manager https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/urjxCGv0oyCBx4jE8SKBpJZ?domain=ethicsolympiad.org ? Mailing Address:PO BOX 116?Dernancourt 5075 Matthew WillsEthics Olympiad Project ManagerPh-0400029660ABN 52606554367 Click here?for an article about the Ethics Olympiad in a recent edition of the Australian Journal of Middle Schooling. Click here?for an article about the Ethics Olympiad in the latest edition of the American Philosophical Association Education Journal. Disclaimer: The information contained in this email may be private and personal or otherwise confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of any part of the information is unauthorised. If you have received this email in error, please inform the sender and delete the document. The Ethics Olympiad does not represent or warrant that files attached to this email are free from computer viruses or other defects. Any attached files are provided?and may be used, on the basis that the user assumes all responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or indirectly from such use. On Saturday, February 17, 2024 at 11:30:20 AM GMT+10:30, sydphil-request at mailman.sydney.edu.au wrote: Send SydPhil mailing list submissions to ??? sydphil at mailman.sydney.edu.au To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit ??? https://mailman.sydney.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/sydphil or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ??? sydphil-request at mailman.sydney.edu.au You can reach the person managing the list at ??? sydphil-owner at mailman.sydney.edu.au When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of SydPhil digest..." Today's Topics: ? 1. ABC Big Ideas Panel Discussion: Critical Reflections on ? ? ? Science and Religion (Anik Waldow) Where is the Soul in Science? Critical Reflections on Science and Religion Wed, 21 Feb 2024 ? 05:00PM - 07:30PM Nelson Mears Auditorium, Chau Chak Wing Museum Free ? Registration: https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/55soCJyBrGfBGw0lnSG9JXW?domain=eventbrite.com.au Description Science in the West did not emerge fully-formed like Athena from the head of Zeus: theoretical frameworks, methodologies and belief systems have been tested and contested, proven, disproven and abandoned. Yet since the 17th century science has profoundly recast our relationship to the world and ourselves. Science began to provide a logical, systemic framework with which to understand not only the world, but knowledge and values, shifting the axis away from a divinely ordained order bestowed by divine beings and religious authorities to one in which rational scientific thought, agency and objectivity began to hold sway. Science today reminds us of our own agency in the building of new knowledge. But can it provide meaningful orientation in key aspects of human life? Traditionally, religion provided community, connection, certainty, salvation, and a strong cultural and moral framework in the face of chaos. Is science able to address these fundamental human needs? In recent years populism, politics and the pandemic ? together with the rise of disinformation and ?fake news? made possible by unregulated social media ? have decentred the trust in science, with conspiracy theories on the rise in the attempt to find answers and orientation in life What has science failed to deliver? Where is the soul in science? ? Speakers Anik Waldow (Sydney),Charles Wolfe (Toulouse), Peter Harrison (UQ) ? Hosted by Natasha Mitchell, ABC Big Ideas Contact The School of Humanities Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences,soh.events at sydney.edu.au ? ? ANIK WALDOW?| Professor of Philosophy?| FAHA Department of Philosophy?|?School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY S404, Quadrangle Building A14 | The University of Sydney | NSW | 2006 | Australia T?+61 2 9114 1245?|?F?+61 2 9351 3918 E?anik.waldow at sydney.edu.au ? Experience Embodied: Early Modern Accounts of the Human Place in Nature, OUP, 2020 https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/Y5leCK1DvKTDgW3P1T3-64Z?domain=global.oup.com ? --------- SydPhil mailing list To unsubscribe, change your membership options, find answers to common problems, or visit our online archives, please go to the list information page: https://mailman.sydney.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/sydphil -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2024TertiaryEthicsOlympiadA4Flyer2.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 654140 bytes Desc: not available URL: