[Limdep Nlogit List] Interpretation of Mixed logit model

[FAN Zhou]

Hi Medard,


Thank you very much for your reply.


Since I used log-normal distribution, and the 'cost' variable represent financial cost, the sign is forced to be negative.


Cheers,

Fan

________________________________
From: Limdep <limdep-bounces at mailman.sydney.edu.au> on behalf of medard kakuru via Limdep <limdep at mailman.sydney.edu.au>
Sent: Thursday, 17 August 2017 19:10
To: Limdep and Nlogit Mailing List
Cc: medard kakuru
Subject: Re: [Limdep Nlogit List] Interpretation of Mixed logit model

Dear Fan,
To begin with, what is the sign of the B_Cost?


Regards,

Medard

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:49 AM, FAN Zhou via Limdep <
limdep at mailman.sydney.edu.au> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
> I have run a Mixed logit model with Nlogit 6. But I am confused by the
> results.
>
>
> I was wondering how to interpret the insignificant mean but significant
> standard distribution for a random parameter. For example, if I set "cost"
> as random parameter, the mean 'B_COST' is insignificant but its associated
> standard deviation "NsCOST" is significant. Does results like this make
> sense?
>
>
> I appreciate any help.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Fan
> _______________________________________________
> Limdep site list
> Limdep at mailman.sydney.edu.au
> http://limdep.itls.usyd.edu.au
>
>
_______________________________________________
Limdep site list
Limdep at mailman.sydney.edu.au
http://limdep.itls.usyd.edu.au