[Limdep Nlogit List] Interpretation of Random coefficients ordered logit parameters
Achilleas' gmail
avassilopoulos.aua at gmail.com
Thu Feb 21 06:07:23 AEDT 2019
Dear all,
I'm estimating a Random Coefficients Ordered Logit Model with Y an ordered
variable and X1 and X2 independent dummy vars:
SETPANEL; GROUP=ID; PDS=ROUNDS $
ORDERED ; PANEL ; Lhs = Y
; Rhs = ONE, X1, X2
; MODEL= LOGIT $
ORDERED ; PANEL; Lhs = Y
; Rhs = one, X1, X2
; RPM
; par
; Fcn = one(n), X1(n), X2(n)
; HALTON
; MODEL= LOGIT $
My results are as follows:
|Means for random parameters
Constant| 8.33434*** .85987 9.69 .0000 6.64903 10.01966
X1 | .12776 .32251 .40 .6920 -.50436 .75988
X2 | -.03393 .33030 -.10 .9182 -.68131 .61344
|Scale parameters for dists. of random parameters
Constant| 3.26244*** .22798 14.31 .0000 2.81560 3.70927
X1 | .62482*** .21928 2.85 .0044 .19503 1.05460
X2 | .78015*** .22758 3.43 .0006 .33409 1.22621
My intuition is that for the X's, the results of the unconditional estimates
mean that their effect is non-significant (i.e. zero) on aggregate but with
strong individual variability (i.e. showing that for some individuals it is
different from zero).
However, when I look at the individual specific (conditional) estimates, I
find a strong indication of their effect being zero for all (i.e. confidence
intervals for all individuals are way far from zero on both ends)
Is my interpretation mistaken? And if not, how I can possibly explain the
different conclusions I get from conditional vs unconditional estimates?
Thank you,
Achilleas
More information about the Limdep
mailing list