[Limdep Nlogit List] standard errors in random effects regression
Andreas Drichoutis
adrihout at aua.gr
Fri Oct 16 02:07:39 EST 2009
Can please someone explain the difference I'm getting from a random effects
regression in Limdep and Stata? Coefficient estimates are the same but
standard errors are completely different. I tend to get more statistical
significant variables in Limdep and tried this with several regressions.
Which ones should I report?
According to Limdep my treatment variable (TREAT_TR) is significant at the
10% level but is not significant according to Stata. In other regressions
I'm getting larger differences.
Regards,
Andreas Drichoutis
--> namelist ; x1=gender,age, period,treat_pr,treat_tr,one $
--> skip $
--> regress ; lhs=bet2lot5 ; rhs=x1 ; pds=10 $
+----------------------------------------------------+
| Ordinary least squares regression |
| Model was estimated Oct 15, 2009 at 05:47:51PM |
| LHS=BET2LOT5 Mean = 1.532028 |
| Standard deviation = 1.210199 |
| WTS=none Number of observs. = 710 |
| Model size Parameters = 6 |
| Degrees of freedom = 704 |
| Residuals Sum of squares = 966.4366 |
| Standard error of e = 1.171657 |
| Fit R-squared = .0692925 |
| Adjusted R-squared = .0626823 |
| Model test F[ 5, 704] (prob) = 10.48 (.0000) |
| Autocorrel Durbin-Watson Stat. = .4687073 |
| Rho = cor[e,e(-1)] = .7656464 |
| Robust VC Newey-West, Periods = 10 |
+----------------------------------------------------+
+--------+--------------+----------------+--------+--------+----------+
|Variable| Coefficient | Standard Error |b/St.Er.|P[|Z|>z]| Mean of X|
+--------+--------------+----------------+--------+--------+----------+
|GENDER | .35515 .22113828 1.606 .1083 .3943662|
|AGE | -.01294 .05868952 -.221 .8255 20.732394|
|PERIOD | .06909*** .02287902 3.020 .0025 5.5000000|
|TREAT_PR| .01037 .20414538 .051 .9595 .4929577|
|TREAT_TR| .34429* .20105428 1.712 .0868 .5070423|
|Constant| 1.10060 1.23528145 .891 .3729 |
+--------+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Note: ***, **, * = Significance at 1%, 5%, 10% level. |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
xtreg bet2lot5 gender age period treat_pr treat_tr, re
Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs =
710
Group variable: id Number of groups =
71
R-sq: within = 0.0876 Obs per group: min =
10
between = 0.0612 avg =
10.0
overall = 0.0693 max =
10
Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(5) =
65.57
corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 =
0.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
bet2lot5 | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf.
Interval]
-------------+--------------------------------------------------------------
--
gender | .3551551 .2502641 1.42 0.156 -.1353535
.8456638
age | -.0129431 .0767783 -0.17 0.866 -.1634259
.1375397
period | .0690943 .0088273 7.83 0.000 .051793
.0863956
treat_pr | .0103745 .2413856 0.04 0.966 -.4627327
.4834816
treat_tr | .3442994 .2429732 1.42 0.156 -.1319193
.820518
_cons | 1.100601 1.635651 0.67 0.501 -2.105216
4.306418
-------------+--------------------------------------------------------------
--
sigma_u | .98865592
sigma_e | .67559506
rho | .68168039 (fraction of variance due to u_i)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
More information about the Limdep
mailing list